Overview: Defamation, Libel & Slander Lawyers
Someone posted that you cheated a client, and it is being shared. A former employee repeated it at an industry event. Defamation lawyers deal with false statements of fact that lower a person or a business in other people's eyes: libel in writing or online, slander when spoken. A harsh opinion, a rude remark or an unflattering truth is not the same thing, and separating them is the first conversation you will have.
The rules are provincial. Several provinces require written notice to a news outlet before a claim can start, and some have legislation letting a defendant ask the court to end a case early where the speech touches the public interest. Quebec handles reputation through its own civil law rather than the common law of libel. Ask a lawyer how they run these claims in your province, and whether they act for claimants, for publishers, or both.
Capture everything before it vanishes. Screenshots showing the full page and the web address, archived copies, the names of people who saw the statement, and a record of lost work or cancelled contracts. Deleted posts are sometimes recoverable and often are not.
Each listing reflects what a firm says about defamation, media and online reputation files. The province and city lists below lead to lawyers within reach, and each city page flags the offices inside the city itself.
Frequently asked questions
What counts as defamation rather than a bad review?
A false statement of fact about an identifiable person or business, communicated to at least one other person, that would lower them in the eyes of reasonable people. Rudeness, criticism and honest opinion fall outside it, and so does anything that turns out to be true. A lawyer starts by separating the factual assertions in a post from the opinions wrapped around them.
Libel or slander: does the distinction matter?
Both are defamation; the difference is the form it took. Libel is written, printed or posted. Slander is spoken, and proving what was actually said is far harder without a recording or a witness. Broadcast material is treated as libel in most provinces. In practice, almost everything that reaches a lawyer these days arrived through a screen.
Can a false online review be taken down?
Sometimes. Start with the platform's reporting process, which deals with reviews that break its own rules faster than any legal route. Where that fails, a demand letter to the author comes next, and a court order after that. Identifying an anonymous account generally means applying to the court, which is slow and not always granted.
How are defamation cases usually billed?
Usually hourly, sometimes with a fixed fee for the opening demand letter. Contingency is uncommon in reputation work because recovery is so hard to forecast. Ask about disbursements, about what happens if the other side applies to have the claim thrown out early, and about who carries the costs if the claim does not succeed.
Should I ask for a retraction before suing?
Often yes. Many provinces expect notice to a news outlet before a claim begins, and a carefully drafted request can produce a correction far quicker than litigation would. Keep the letter factual and specific about which statements are wrong. A letter that overreaches tends to get quoted back at you later.
Defamation, privacy or harassment: which claim fits?
Defamation deals with falsehood. Where the information is accurate but private, or an intimate image was shared without consent, privacy and image based remedies apply, and several provinces have their own legislation covering that. Repeated targeting of a person can also be a criminal harassment matter. Describe the whole pattern to the lawyer, not only the worst post.
